A first order with a new supplier
You have no established record of delivery, quality or commercial conduct with this seller.
Supplier verification in China compares what a seller says about its legal identity, operations, factory relationship, contact points and payment recipient. Its purpose is to reduce uncertainty before a meaningful purchase or transfer—not to guarantee how the supplier will perform in the future.
China Moshaver defines the review scope around your decision, examines the company information and documents supplied, identifies visible inconsistencies and, where required, assesses available evidence connected to the stated site or operations.

Clear information for your next decision
Depending on the information available and the agreed scope, the review can cover company identity, a supplied Business License or registration document, legal name and address, registered business scope, contact consistency, the seller’s relationship with a stated factory, operational evidence and material inconsistencies in payment information.
The aim is not to force a definitive answer for every supplier claim. A useful result distinguishes what is consistent or verified, what needs more evidence, what conflicts with other information and what could not be checked.
You have no established record of delivery, quality or commercial conduct with this seller.
Especially where the beneficiary or receiving account has not appeared in earlier project documents.
Marketplace status is useful context, but it does not replace an independent company, document and payment consistency check.
The evidence linking the seller to production and its actual role in the supply chain needs to be understood.
A new beneficiary, bank country or account should pause the transfer until it is confirmed through a known independent channel.
Different names, addresses, contacts, websites, quotations or documents need clarification before commitment.
| Subject | What is reviewed | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Company identity | Legal name and the principal company details provided | Match or inconsistency record |
| Business License / company documents | Visible document data and its connection to the supplier in this project | Information summary and attention points |
| Business scope | Whether the registered or presented activity appears compatible with the claimed product or service | Compatibility or risk note |
| Address and contacts | Address, telephone, email, website and other available contact points | Consistency check |
| Factory relationship | Evidence offered for the stated factory, production role or operational link | Verified evidence or unresolved claim |
| Payment information | Consistency between the contracting party, beneficiary and supplied payment documents | Payment consistency note |
| Operational activity | Available evidence relating to the company or stated location | Evidence summary |
| Supplier claims | Visible conflicts in factory status, capacity or export capability claims | Claim / Evidence / Limitation |
Supplier verification is not Product Inspection; manufactured goods require separate acceptance checks.
A company review cannot guarantee that future batches will be defect-free or identical to a sample.
Certification, destination-country rules and technical requirements may need specialist review.
Limited or public information must not be presented as a full financial audit or proof of liquidity.
Factory evidence does not necessarily prove the supplier owns every line or machine shown.
A beneficiary check may reveal inconsistencies, but it is not a bank guarantee, insurance or a “fully safe” promise.
| Topic | Supplier Verification | Factory Audit |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Check supplier identity and visible risk | Assess the factory site and systems in greater depth |
| Focus | Company information and claim consistency | Factory operations and on-site evidence |
| Business documents | Yes | Yes, usually within a broader scope |
| Site evidence | May be included | A central part of a genuine audit |
| Production systems | Limited | Deeper and scope-specific |
| Quality management | Limited | May examine the quality system |
| Capacity claims | Reviews claims against available evidence | Requires more specialised on-site assessment |
| Best suited to | Before a purchase or payment | A more serious factory capability assessment |
Being a Trading Company is not inherently negative. The important question is whether the buyer understands the counterparty’s role and whether its claims are consistent with available evidence.
Meaningful evidence links the supplier to production, a stated facility or relevant operations.
The company may source, consolidate or manage orders through other factories; that role should be transparent.
The available information is insufficient for a clear conclusion and the claim remains unresolved.
A supplier document is more than an image or PDF to file away. Legal name, address, business scope and other comparable details should be checked against the quotation, contract, invoice, website and project contact information.
A change or inconsistency in the payment recipient deserves attention. The contracting company name, invoice or contract and beneficiary name are compared within the limits of the available information.
Address information and location-related evidence, only where it is genuinely available.
Images, video, a site visit or documents connecting the supplier to a production site.
Evidence relating to production or trade in the product being purchased.
Consistency across names, email, telephone, WeChat and other channels.
Files supplied during the purchasing process and their connection to the company.
Alignment of the quotation, proforma, invoice or contract with the transaction party.
⚑ Different company names without a clear explanation
⚑ A supplier name that differs from the beneficiary
⚑ Inconsistent addresses or contact information
⚑ A factory claim without sufficient evidence
⚑ Unusual pressure for rapid payment
⚑ A sudden change in payment instructions
⚑ Documents containing conflicting details
⚑ A product that appears unrelated to the stated business scope
⚑ Refusal to provide basic verification information
⚑ Contradictory answers to straightforward business questions
⚑ Repeated changes of company identity during negotiation
⚑ A new email or channel issuing payment instructions
Company, contact, relevant links and the product or project.
Information received and notes on its consistency.
The actual documents examined within the agreed scope.
Available evidence and the limits of any conclusion.
Only where payment review is included in scope.
Each issue listed separately with its context and evidence.
Questions that could not be confirmed with sufficient evidence.
Sample, clarification, site visit, inspection or pause until resolved.
| Review outcome | Suggested action |
|---|---|
| Core information is consistent and the order is small | Continue negotiation and obtain a sample where useful |
| The supplier is new and the order is large | Verification + Sample + Inspection |
| The factory claim is important to the decision | Site Verification or Factory Audit |
| Payment information changed | Hold payment until independently clarified |
| Documents and company name conflict | Obtain explanation and further evidence before commitment |
| The supplier was checked but the product was not | Quality Inspection before shipment |
| The supplier seems suitable but the product is not final | Sourcing or Sample Coordination |
Cost depends on the agreed scope. A basic company-information check is different from a project covering several companies, multiple documents, factory evidence, payment review or a site visit.
The review can only use information that can genuinely be accessed, observed or compared.
Company status, contacts, accounts or supplier behaviour may change later.
Legal existence or apparent activity does not guarantee delivery, quality or future conduct.
Supplier credibility is not the same as the quality of a particular order.
Normal verification must not be represented as a financial audit.
It is not a substitute for specialist legal, tax, regulatory or certification review.
It does not replace an appropriate contract, enforceable protections or controlled payment terms.
Company verification does not replace product sampling or inspection.
No public, permission-cleared and fully redacted report sample is currently available. A sample will be published only after confidential information from a real project has been removed and permission has been obtained. No artificial Business License, report, factory image, company name or result is shown as evidence.
This section shows the report structure only. Every field is blank and no real company, licence, identifier, date, seal, signature or conclusion is displayed.
Verification status: Not assessed — this is a demo structure only.
No. Marketplace status is one initial data point; company identity, documents, beneficiary and project-specific information still need separate review.
Verification focuses on identity, documents, contacts, claims and visible risk. A Factory Audit is a deeper examination of the site, processes and factory systems.
The transaction party, purchasing documents, company information and beneficiary should be compared for consistency. A sudden instruction change needs independent confirmation.
No. A trading company can be legitimate and suitable; its role and the evidence supporting its claims need to be clear.
No. Company verification and Quality Inspection are separate. Manufactured goods require their own inspection against acceptance criteria.
Depending on scope, the supplier–factory relationship or site evidence can be reviewed. A full factory audit requires a separately defined scope.
No. Verification reduces uncertainty and may identify inconsistencies or red flags; it cannot guarantee future behaviour.
Send the supplier name, link, quotation or proforma, contact details and—where relevant—company documents or payment information.
Send the supplier name, link, quotation or proforma and the point you are uncertain about. The scope is defined around your purchasing stage, the value of the decision and the evidence available.
Share the product link or photo, quantity, destination country and city. Tell us which stage you need help with.
Request an initial review←